Reagentes e instrumentos para imunologia, biologia celular e biologia molecular.
 
> Mouse Anti-Chicken Ia-BIOT

Mouse Anti-Chicken Ia-BIOT

Imprimir Imprimir
Please log in

Referência 8290-08

Tamanho : 0.5mg

Marca : Southern Biotech

Contactar o distribuidor local :


Telefone : +1 850 650 7790

Product Specifications

More Information
Clone CIa
Isotype Mouse (BALB/c) IgMκ
Isotype Control Mouse IgM-BIOT (11E10)
Specificity Chicken/Quail/Dove/Pigeon/Duck Ia
Alternative Names MHC Class II
Description The chicken Ia antigen is expressed on B cells, a subpopulation of the monocyte/macrophage lineage of cells, and mitogen-activated T cells. The molecule recognized by this antibody is similar in structure to the murine Ia antigens and human DR antigens.
Immunogen Splenic leukocytes from an outbred nine-week-old chicken
Conjugate BIOT (Biotin)
Buffer Formulation Phosphate buffered saline containing < 0.1% sodium azide
Clonality Monoclonal
Concentration 0.5 mg/mL
Volume 1.0 mL
Recommended Storage 2-8°C
Applications Flow Cytometry – Quality tested 1,7,9,10
Immunohistochemistry-Frozen Sections – Reported in literature 2-6
Immunocytochemistry – Reported in literature 1,7,8
Immunoprecipitation – Reported in literature 1
Blocking – Reported in literature 1

RRID Number AB_2796484

Documentation

Documentation
Technical Bulletin Safety Datasheet
Certificate of Analysis Lookup

Enter the Catalog Number and Lot Number for the Certificate of Analysis you wish to view

Other Conjugates and Formulations

UNLB FITC PE

Citations

  1. 1. Ewert DL, Munchus MS, Chen CH, Cooper MD. Analysis of structural properties and cellular distribution of avian Ia antigen by using monoclonal antibody to monomorphic determinants. J Immunol. 1984;132:2524-30. (Immunogen, FC, ICC, IP, Block, Quail, Dove, Pigeon, & Duck Reactivity)
  2. 2. Wang X, Efr GF. Apoptosis in feathers of Smyth line chickens with autoimmune vitiligo. J Autoimmun. 2004;22:21-30. (IHC-FS)
  3. 3. O'Halloran EK, Oesterle EC. Characterization of leukocyte subtypes in chicken inner ear sensory epithelia. J Comp Neurol. 2004;475:340-60. (IHC-FS)
  4. 4. Das SC, Nagasaka N, Yoshimura Y. Changes in the localization of antigen presenting cells and T cells in the utero-vaginal junction after repeated artificial insemination in laying hens. J Reprod Dev. 2005;51:683-7. (IHC-FS)
  5. 5. Subedi K, Yoshimura Y. Expression of MHC class I and II in growing ovarian follicles of young and old laying hens, Gallus domesticus. J Poult Sci. 2005;42:101-9. (IHC-FS)
  6. 6. Yoshimura Y, Fukui T, Nishibori M, Isobe N. Effects of age and gonadal steroids on the localization of antigen presenting cells in the epididymis of the male chicken, Gallus domesticus. J Reprod Dev. 2006;52:363-71. (IHC-FS)
  7. 7. Bakri Y, Sarrazin S, Mayer UP, Tillmanns S, Nerlov C, Boned A, et al. Balance of MafB and PU.1 specifies alternative macrophage or dendritic cell fate. Blood. 2005;105:2707-16. (FC, ICC)
  8. 8. Niikura M, Kim T, Hunt HD, Burnside J, Morgan RW, Dodgson JB, et al. Marek's disease virus up-regulates major histocompatibility complex class II cell surface expression in infected cells. Virology. 2007;359:212-9. (ICC)
  9. 9. Rautenschlein S, Subramanian A, Sharma JM. Bioactivities of a tumour necrosis-like factor released by chicken macrophages. Dev Comp Immunol. 1999;23:629-40. (FC)
  10. 10. Chrząstek K, Piasecki T, Wieliczko A. Impact of CpG oligodeoxynucleotide stimulation on percentage of T and B cells in chicken. Pol J Vet Sci. 2013;16:551-4. (FC)